Assume: √2 = a/b such that a,b are two integers (whole numbers) which share no common factors.
Therefore: a = √2.b (multiplication by b)
Squaring: a2 = 2b2
Because a2 is a multiple of 2; a2 is an even number.
[Note at this point if x is an odd integer; x2 is also an odd integer:
If x is an odd integer, there exists some integer, n, such that x = 2n+1.
Therefore: x2 = (2n+1)2
= (2n+1)(2n+1)
= 4n2+4n+1
Taking a factor of 2 from the n components: x2 = 2(2n2+2n)+1.
If n is an integer, n2 is an integer. Likewise 2n is an integer.
Therefore: 2n2 is also an integer.
Therefore: 2n2+2n as a sum of integers is also an integer.
Thus: x2 = 2(some integer)+1
which is equivalent to 2n+1, as n is also 'some integer'.
Thus, x2 conforms with the initial condition defining odd numbers;
x2 is shown also to be an odd number.]
As: a2 is even, a must also be even (as an odd number squared is odd; see above).
Therefore: a = 2c (where c is some integer)
Squaring: a2 = 4c2
Using (a2 = 2b2):
4c2 = 2b2
Therefore: 2c2 = b2 (dividing by 2)
Because b2 is a multiple of 2; b2 is an even number.
As: b2 is even, b must also be even (as odd squares are odd; see above).
Therefore: a and b share at least one common factor, 2, thus contradicting the initial assumption such that a,b share no common factors.
Therefore: √2 cannot be expressed as a ratio of two factors a,b and is irrational.
QED
7 comments:
Hannah, surely you realise that we are but mere mortals to you, and that we cannot begin to fathom the complexities of what you have just written out?
It boggles my mind, it does. But that's just maths in general really.
Read it again Julian, everything you need is there, .
That's one sweet proof.
You lost me at mathematician.
Sorry Julian, sorry Mike; I'll try not to be so geeky next post...I think the poem went down better yes?
1 + 1 = 2
doesn't it ?
If a is a letter and
1 is a number
why put them together and confuse the hell out of us?
puzzled of hounslow
Yeah, I really enjoyed the poem :D
Yeah the poem was darn good.
Post a Comment